Southern Africa Review

Southern Africa

How freshwater withdrawal pressure changed in Southern Africa

South Africa’s recorded water stress indicator rose from 40.77% in 2000 to 67.60% in 2022. In the other five countries in this comparison, the 2022 indicator was below 3%.

Sources checked

2000 and 2022Freshwater stress by country

2000

Shared scale · 0% to 67.6%

  • Botswana2.03%
  • Lesotho2.57%
  • Mozambique1.04%
  • Namibia0.92%
  • South Africa40.77%
  • Zambia2.9%

The national indicator divides freshwater withdrawals by available renewable resources.

Source 1

Freshwater stress, 2000 to 2022

Shared scale from zero to 100.00 %. A gap marks a year without an observation.

Botswana

Botswana · %2000: 2.03 · 2001: 2.03 · 2002: 2.03 · 2003: 2.04 · 2004: 2.04 · 2005: 2.04 · 2006: 2.05 · 2007: 2.05 · 2008: 2.05 · 2009: 2.06 · 2010: 2.06 · 2011: 2.06 · 2012: 2.03 · 2013: 2.00 · 2014: 1.96 · 2015: 1.96 · 2016: 2.10 · 2017: 2.02 · 2018: 2.13 · 2019: 2.11 · 2020: 2.31 · 2021: 2.44 · 2022: 2.23

20002022

2.23 % · 2022

Lesotho

Lesotho · %2000: 2.57 · 2001: 2.57 · 2002: 2.57 · 2003: 2.57 · 2004: 2.57 · 2005: 2.57 · 2006: 2.57 · 2007: 2.57 · 2008: 2.57 · 2009: 2.57 · 2010: 2.57 · 2011: 2.57 · 2012: 2.57 · 2013: 2.57 · 2014: 2.57 · 2015: 2.57 · 2016: 2.57 · 2017: 2.57 · 2018: 2.57 · 2019: 2.57 · 2020: 2.57 · 2021: 2.57 · 2022: 2.57

20002022

2.57 % · 2022

Mozambique

Mozambique · %2000: 1.04 · 2001: 1.07 · 2002: 1.13 · 2003: 1.19 · 2004: 1.24 · 2005: 1.30 · 2006: 1.34 · 2007: 1.39 · 2008: 1.43 · 2009: 1.48 · 2010: 1.52 · 2011: 1.57 · 2012: 1.61 · 2013: 1.66 · 2014: 1.71 · 2015: 1.75 · 2016: 1.75 · 2017: 1.75 · 2018: 1.75 · 2019: 1.75 · 2020: 1.75 · 2021: 1.75 · 2022: 1.75

20002022

1.75 % · 2022

Namibia

Namibia · %2000: 0.92 · 2001: 0.89 · 2002: 0.86 · 2003: 0.83 · 2004: 0.81 · 2005: 0.78 · 2006: 0.75 · 2007: 0.72 · 2008: 0.70 · 2009: 0.67 · 2010: 0.64 · 2011: 0.61 · 2012: 0.59 · 2013: 0.56 · 2014: 0.53 · 2015: 0.50 · 2016: 0.47 · 2017: 0.45 · 2018: 0.42 · 2019: 0.39 · 2020: 0.36 · 2021: 0.31 · 2022: 0.31

20002022

0.31 % · 2022

South Africa

South Africa · %2000: 40.77 · 2001: 41.45 · 2002: 42.13 · 2003: 42.82 · 2004: 43.50 · 2005: 44.18 · 2006: 44.86 · 2007: 45.54 · 2008: 46.22 · 2009: 46.91 · 2010: 47.59 · 2011: 48.27 · 2012: 48.95 · 2013: 45.74 · 2014: 52.75 · 2015: 59.75 · 2016: 60.97 · 2017: 62.06 · 2018: 62.89 · 2019: 64.04 · 2020: 65.03 · 2021: 66.89 · 2022: 67.60

20002022

67.60 % · 2022

Zambia

Zambia · %2000: 2.90 · 2001: 2.87 · 2002: 2.84 · 2003: 2.84 · 2004: 2.84 · 2005: 2.84 · 2006: 2.84 · 2007: 2.84 · 2008: 2.84 · 2009: 2.84 · 2010: 2.84 · 2011: 2.84 · 2012: 2.84 · 2013: 2.84 · 2014: 2.84 · 2015: 2.84 · 2016: 2.84 · 2017: 2.84 · 2018: 2.84 · 2019: 2.84 · 2020: 2.84 · 2021: 2.84 · 2022: 2.84

20002022

2.84 % · 2022

FAO AQUASTAT freshwater stress via World Bank WDI

The South African ratio rose across both decades

The indicator was 47.59% in 2010 and 65.03% in 2020. The 2022 reading was about 26.8 percentage points above the 2000 reading. South Africa’s level makes the differences among the other five countries small on a shared scale. Source 1

The other national ratios moved by less

Mozambique went from 1.04% in 2000 to 1.75% in 2022. Botswana moved from 2.03% to 2.23%, while Namibia moved from 0.92% to 0.32%. Lesotho’s reported series holds near 2.57% through the period. Source 1

The denominator accounts for environmental needs

The indicator compares withdrawal for agriculture, industry and services with the renewable freshwater available after allowance for environmental flows. A change can reflect the withdrawal estimate, the resource estimate or both. Source 2

National ratios average across river systems

Withdrawals can concentrate in a small part of a country or peak during a dry season. For irrigation, water supply or industrial planning, compare the national indicator with basin records, storage and withdrawals by season. Source 2

Sources

Open the data and source notes